The prosecution has begun investigating the situation in which the Supreme Court sent a judge sent to the Constitutional Court to remove the inside information from the Constitutional Court.

Lee Kyu-jin, who is accused of involvement in judicial inspections and allegations of court-to-court transactions, was seized at the offices of a standing committee member and a judge of the Seoul Central District Court.

The prosecution has sent inspectors and investigators to the office of the former standing committee member at the Seocho-dong Seoul Court Complex in Seoul, and to the office of the resident and judge Choi, to secure a computer hard disk and log book.

The former chairman of the Supreme Court, who is a senior judge, has been excluded from the trial because of suspicions about his involvement in the judging investigation after the allegations of blacklist of the judiciary.

The prosecution has secured clues about the allegations that the judge, Choi, dispatched to the Constitutional Court from the year 2015 to early this year, leaked internal information to the Supreme Court, including details of the constitutional judges' complaints about cases involving courts, including the courts.

The prosecution suspects that the inside information of the Constitutional Court, which Choi's deputy chief has been handed over to,

This former commissioner is suspected of interrogating judges who are critical of the judicial administration during the Yong Sung Tae Judiciary and intervening in the judicial meeting itself.

Lee Hyun-sook, a former pro-union advocate of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party, is suspected of demanding that the postponement be postponed, in addition to the trial of the judge in advance of the lawsuit filed by the provincial council in Jeolla Province in 2015.

The prosecution also obtained a number of statements in February last year that the deliberations of the Planning and Coordination Department of the Administrative Office of the Supreme Administrative Court had instructions from the previous standing committee in the process of deleting the suspicious documents related to the judicial investigation.

Prosecutors also filed a warrant for seizure of a hard disk used by the former chief judge at the time of the former commissioner 's committee working at the sentencing committee, but were dismissed.

The court also did not issue a warrant for seizure of other judges who were responsible for the affairs of the court.

The prosecution said that the court ruled that "the statements and documents of related parties were secured", "no investigation was conducted", "the possibility of arbitrary submission can not be ruled out", "enough to permit seizure of offices and residential areas, And it is not recognized. "

The prosecution plans to receive a seizure search warrant for the bribery case record of Busan construction contractor Jung Mo, and hand over related materials from the Supreme Court.

The prosecution filed two previous requests to read the trial records, but the Supreme Court rejected it.

The prosecution has been involved in the trial of Chung to overcome the suspicion that the court judge has been involved in the trial of Chung, We got clues.