The controversy of the ground war continues to occupy the Israeli media, highlighting the requirements of this war on the ground and logistically, as well as the criticism of former politicians and security leaders for what they call the delay in the war.
This comes amid accusations of the occupation army of information and field failure following the success of the Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades, the military wing of the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas), in carrying out the operation "Al-Aqsa Flood" by surprise from the security and military services, and the Israeli media is witnessing other discussions trying to assess American support and explore its borders, and questions about what can be considered a moment of victory.
In a threatening tone, former Minister of Interior and Justice Aplett Shaked opined, that "Israel is forced to be wholly in this war because it is either us or them, and the head must be cut off from the body of all Hamas leadership, not only for the five who remained here, but for all its military leaders, all of whom must return their souls to the Creator, without which we would have lost the war."
Shaked added that there are several ways to do this, and the army, the command and the war council must decide the appropriate way, and if you do not achieve that, you will have lost the war.
Former military intelligence chief Ze'evi Farkash noted that one of the important things is the same logistical combat and the ability to secure armaments and provide ammunition and replacement parts during the war.
He added that it is known that Israel has military equipment that is very similar to American equipment in terms of aircraft, maintenance, etc., and therefore believes that the length of the logistical breath is very important, and if the war was on two fronts, it would require further preparation.
Former Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni said that the cabinet has a very important task, as Israel entered this event after an information and field failure, stressing that goals must be set without there being a vast difference between slogans and reality.